Shain v. Red Top Cab & Baggage Co.

167 So. 2d 760
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 22, 1964
DocketNo. 63-686
StatusPublished

This text of 167 So. 2d 760 (Shain v. Red Top Cab & Baggage Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shain v. Red Top Cab & Baggage Co., 167 So. 2d 760 (Fla. Ct. App. 1964).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in the trial court appeals from an adverse final judgment, rendered upon a directed verdict in a personal injury action. He sought damages for injury sustained while a passenger in a limousine ■owned by Red Top Cab and Baggage Co., and operated by Red Top Sedan Service, Inc., which had been purchased initially from the appellee, General Motors Corporation. The sole theory of liability pleaded or attempted to be proved by the plaintiff was the liability of the defendants under the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur.

We affirm the action of the trial judge in that the record on appeal failed to reveal any control in the appellee, General Motors Corporation, to warrant the application of res ipsa loquitur [see: American District Electric Protective Co. v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Company, 129 Fla. 518, 177 So. 294; Frash v. Sarres, Fla.1952, 60 So.2d 924], and that the evidence failed to reveal any failure on the part of the ap-pellees, Red Top Cab and Baggage Co., and Red Top Sedan Service, Inc., in the exercise of due care in the maintenance of their equipment. To the contrary, they demonstrated that the defect causing the accident was a latent one, undiscoverable by inspection. In this connection, see: Schott v. Pancoast Properties, Fla.1952, 57 So.2d 431; Hine v. Fox, Fla.1956, 89 So.2d 13; Martin v. Powell, Fla.App.1958, 101 So.2d 610; Brookshire v. Bendix Co., Fla.App.1963, 153 So.2d 55, Cert. Denied, Fla.1964, 163 So.2d 881.

Therefore, for the reasons stated above, the actions of the trial judge, here under review, are hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schott v. Pancoast Properties
57 So. 2d 431 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1952)
Hine v. Fox
89 So. 2d 13 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1956)
Brookshire v. Florida Bendix Co.
153 So. 2d 55 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
National Airlines, Incorporated v. Fleming
141 So. 2d 343 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)
Frash v. Sarres
60 So. 2d 924 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1952)
Martin v. Powell
101 So. 2d 610 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
167 So. 2d 760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shain-v-red-top-cab-baggage-co-fladistctapp-1964.