Shaikh, Zakir v. State

Opinion

Order entered June 20, 2013

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-00735-CR No. 05-12-00736-CR

ZAKIR SHAIKH, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F11-00307-J & F11-00479-J

ORDER On June 5, 2013, we ordered the Dallas County District Clerk to prepare and file a

supplemental clerk’s record containing a detailed itemization of the costs assessed in these cases,

including but not limited to, specific court costs, fees, and court appointed attorney fees. On

June 14, 2013, the Dallas County District Clerk filed the supplemental clerk’s records. However,

the detail itemization of costs included in each of the supplemental record does not comply with

the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. arts. 103.001, 103.006

(West 2006).

Accordingly, we ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within seven days of

the date of this order, a second supplemental clerk’s record in each case that contains a detailed itemization of the costs assessed in each case that complies with articles 103.001 and 103.006 of

the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. See id. art. 103.001 (“A cost is not payable by the person

charged with the cost until a written bill is produced or is ready to be produced, containing the

items of cost, signed by the officer who charged the cost or the officer who is entitled to receive

payment for the cost.”) (emphasis added); 103.006 (“If a criminal action or proceeding . . . is

appealed, an officer of the court shall certify and sign a bill of costs stating the costs that have

accrued and send the bill of cost to the court to which the action or proceeding is . . . appealed)

(emphasis added).

/s/ MICHAEL J. O'NEILL PRESIDING JUSTICE