Shahrokhi Vs. Burrow (Child Custody)
This text of Shahrokhi Vs. Burrow (Child Custody) (Shahrokhi Vs. Burrow (Child Custody)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
ALI SHAHROKHI, No. 83662 Appellant, vs. KIZZY BURROW, Respondent. FILED OCT 2 8 2021 EUZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT BY DEPUTY CLERK
ORDER 'DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from a series of orders entered by the district court. Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Clark County; Dawn Throne, Judge. Review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the orders designated in the notice of appeal are not substantively appealable. See NRAP 3A(b). This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or court rule. Taylor Constr. Co. v. Hilton Hotels, 100 Nev. 207, 678 P.2d 1152 (1984). No statute or court rule provides for an appeal from an order denying a motion to disqualify the presiding judge, an order denying motion for sanctions pursuant to NRCP 11, or from an order denying a "Demand for Bill of Particulars and Cause of Accusation U.S.
Supnew Cower OF NEVADA
Cadish A , J. Pickering Herndon cc: Hon. Dawn Throne, District Judge, Family Court Division Ali Shahrokhi Marzola & Ruiz Law Group PLLC Kizzy Burrow Eighth District Court Clerk 1The motion to withdraw as counsel of record for respondent is granted. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) L947A 04e9. 2 f': . ail
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Shahrokhi Vs. Burrow (Child Custody), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shahrokhi-vs-burrow-child-custody-nev-2021.