Shahin v. UPS Store, Inc.
This text of Shahin v. UPS Store, Inc. (Shahin v. UPS Store, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
NINA SHAHIN, § § No. 406, 2018 Plaintiff Below, § Appellant, § Court Below—Superior Court § of the State of Delaware v. § § UPS STORE, INC., et al.,1 § C.A. No. K17A-12-001 NEP § Defendant Below, § Appellee. §
Submitted: January 11, 2019 Decided: February 21, 2019
Before STRINE, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and VAUGHN, Justices.
ORDER
The appellant, Nina Shahin, appeals from the Superior Court’s order dated
July 10, 2018, denying Shahin’s motion for reconsideration of the Superior Court’s
order dated May 9, 2018. The Superior Court affirmed a decision of the Court of
Common Pleas in which the Court of Common Pleas entered summary judgment
against Shahin for failure to join and serve an indispensable party. After
1 The Court has used the caption Nina Shahin v. UPS Store, Inc., et al., as used by the appellant; however, the record reflects that Shahin never effected service upon an entity named UPS Store, Inc. consideration of her arguments and the record on appeal, we AFFIRM on the basis
of the Superior Court’s decisions.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT: /s/ Leo E. Strine, Jr. Chief Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Shahin v. UPS Store, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shahin-v-ups-store-inc-del-2019.