Shahid v. Ridgewood Bushwick Senior Citizen Council, Inc.

55 A.D.3d 716, 864 N.Y.S.2d 781

This text of 55 A.D.3d 716 (Shahid v. Ridgewood Bushwick Senior Citizen Council, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shahid v. Ridgewood Bushwick Senior Citizen Council, Inc., 55 A.D.3d 716, 864 N.Y.S.2d 781 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

an action, inter alia, to recover damages for trespass, injury to property, and intentional infliction of emotional distress arising from racially-motivated harassment, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schneier, J.), dated August 14, 2007, which granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court correctly determined that the evidence submitted in support of that branch of the defendant’s motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint was sufficient to establish the defendant’s prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]). In opposition, the plaintiffs’ vague and conclusory assertions failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 560 [1980]; Daleo v James, 52 AD3d 766 [2008]; Batts v Page, 51 AD3d 833, 834 [2008]; Waterman v Weinstein Mem. Chapel, 49 AD3d 717, 718 [2008]; Martynick v TDX Constr. Corp., 251 AD2d 465, 466 [1998]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Skelos, J.E, Fisher, Dickerson and Belen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zuckerman v. City of New York
404 N.E.2d 718 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
Winegrad v. New York University Medical Center
476 N.E.2d 642 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
Alvarez v. Prospect Hospital
501 N.E.2d 572 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
Waterman v. Weinstein Memorial Chapel
49 A.D.3d 717 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Batts v. Page
51 A.D.3d 833 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Daleo v. James
52 A.D.3d 766 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Martynick v. TDX Construction Corp.
251 A.D.2d 465 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
55 A.D.3d 716, 864 N.Y.S.2d 781, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shahid-v-ridgewood-bushwick-senior-citizen-council-inc-nyappdiv-2008.