Shahid Buttar for Congress Committee v. Hearst Communications, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California·Decided May 16, 2023·No. 3:21-cv-05566·Unknown

Opinion

SHAHID BUTTAR FOR CONGRESS Case No. 21-cv-05566-EMC COMMITTEE, et al., Plaintiffs, ORDER MODIFYING AWARD OF v. HEARST COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Defendant. Following the Court’s order granting the motion for attorney’s fees in favor of Defendant Hearst Communications, Inc. (“Hearst”), Plaintiffs Shahid Buttar and Shahid Buttar for Congress Committee (“SBCC”) filed a supplemental declaration with his tax returns. Because Mr. Buttar has shown and declared under penalty of perjury that he faces dire financial circumstances, the Court gives weight to the equitable considerations and trims off a significant percentage of the attorney’s fees and costs, Miller v. Los Angeles Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 827 F.2d 617, 622 (9th Cir. 1987) (considering financial resources), though the Court declines to eliminate the fees award entirely, id. at 621 (“However, a district court should not refuse to award attorney's fees to a prevailing defendant under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 or 42 U.S.C. § 2000e–5(k) solely on the ground of the plaintiff's financial situation.”). The Court thus reduces the original award of $87,893.55 to $5,000 to be paid within 24 months of the date of this order. Dated: May 16, 2023 ______________________________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shahid Buttar for Congress Committee v. Hearst Communications, Inc., (N.D. Cal. 2023).

Shahid Buttar for Congress Committee v. Hearst Communications, Inc. (Shahid Buttar for Congress Committee v. Hearst Communications, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related