Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Shahan v. State

Shahan v. State

111 S.E. 224, 28 Ga. App. 363, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 515
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 8, 1922·No. 13128·Published

Opinion

Luke, J.

The defendant was convicted of the offense of manufacturing liquor. His conviction was dependent entirely upon circumstantial evidence. A careful examination of the entire record convinces us that his conviction was not authorized. It is not necessary to consider the special grounds of the motion for a new trial. It was error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed,

Bloodworth, J., concurs. Broyles, C. J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shahan v. State, 111 S.E. 224, 28 Ga. App. 363, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 515 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

111 S.E. 224 (Shahan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.