Shah v. State

992 A.2d 1237, 2010 WL 1492866
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Shah v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 16 A.3d 938
Supreme Court of Delaware·Decided April 14, 2010·No. 38, 2010·Published

Opinion

KUSHAL SHAH, f/k/a GERRON LINDSEY, Defendant Below-Appellant,
v.
STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff Below-Appellee.

No. 38, 2010.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Submitted: February 17, 2010.
Decided: April 14, 2010.

Before HOLLAND, BERGER, and JACOBS, Justices.

ORDER

CAROLYN BERGER, Justice.

This 14th day of April 2010, after careful consideration of appellant's opening brief and the State's motion to affirm, we find it manifest that the judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court's well-reasoned decision dated January 14, 2010. The Superior Court did not err in concluding that appellant's fifth motion for postconviction relief was procedurally barred and that appellant had failed to overcome the procedural hurdles.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shah v. State, 992 A.2d 1237, 2010 WL 1492866 (Del. 2010).

992 A.2d 1237 (Shah v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.