Shah v. Lextaj Corp. N.V.

248 A.D.2d 285, 670 N.Y.S.2d 78, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3187

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered July 25, 1997, which, in an action for breach of contract by plaintiff concierge service operator against defendant hotel, denied plaintiffs motion to compel disclosure of documents pertaining to defendant’s relationship with the person who succeeded plaintiff in the operation of the concierge service, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion was properly denied in this breach of employment contract action on the ground that defendant’s relationship with plaintiffs successor is not material and necessary to plaintiffs claim (see, Feeley v Midas Props., 168 AD2d 416).

Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shah v. Lextaj Corp. N.V., 248 A.D.2d 285, 670 N.Y.S.2d 78, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3187 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

248 A.D.2d 285 (Shah v. Lextaj Corp. N.V.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Feeley v. Midas Properties, Inc.
168 A.D.2d 416 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)