Shah v. Kukes

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1124

SYED Z. SHAH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

and

TALLAT SHAH, wife,

Plaintiff,

versus

SCOTT KUKES, LTC; DAVID LAMM, COL; PAUL T. DAVIS, LTC; GREGORY ALLEN ARMSTRONG, Special Agent; KEVIN BENEFIELD, CW2,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-04-390-1)

Submitted: April 29, 2005 Decided: May 19, 2005

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Syed Z. Shah, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Parker, Ralph Andrew Price, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Syed Z. Shah appeals the district court’s order granting

Defendants’ motion to dismiss in part, granting Defendants’ motion

for summary judgment with respect to all remaining claims, and

denying Shah’s complaint of employment discrimination based on

race, color, and national origin filed pursuant to Title VII of the

Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000). We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Shah v. Kukes, No. CA-04-390-1 (E.D. Va. Dec. 21,

2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -