Shah v. Eastern Silk Industries, Ltd.
490 N.E.2d 548, 67 N.Y.2d 632, 499 N.Y.S.2d 681, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 16729
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (112 AD2d 870; see also, Foss v City of Rochester, 66 NY2d 872).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone and Hancock, Jr.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shah v. Eastern Silk Industries, Ltd., 490 N.E.2d 548, 67 N.Y.2d 632, 499 N.Y.S.2d 681, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 16729 (N.Y. 1986).
490 N.E.2d 548 (Shah v. Eastern Silk Industries, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sojitz Corp. v. Prithvi Information Solutions Ltd.
82 A.D.3d 89 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
MFAI (Jersey) Ltd. v. Westbury Holdings, Inc.
264 A.D.2d 663 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Priolo v. St. Mary's Home for Working Girls, Inc.
157 Misc. 2d 494 (New York Supreme Court, 1993)
European American Bank v. Streisand
177 A.D.2d 301 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Citicorp Services, Inc. v. Hussain
143 Misc. 2d 506 (New York Supreme Court, 1989)