Shah v. Eastern Silk Industries, Ltd.
This text of 490 N.E.2d 548 (Shah v. Eastern Silk Industries, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (112 AD2d 870; see also, Foss v City of Rochester, 66 NY2d 872).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone and Hancock, Jr.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
490 N.E.2d 548, 67 N.Y.2d 632, 499 N.Y.S.2d 681, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 16729, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shah-v-eastern-silk-industries-ltd-ny-1986.