Shafto v. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America
This text of 67 A.2d 692 (Shafto v. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal is from a judgment entered after a jury verdict. We are asked to reverse on the ground that the verdict is so clearly against the weight of evidence as to be without legal justification. To justify a reversal under Rule 1:2-20 it must be clear that the verdict is the result of misake, partiality or prejudice. We do not so find.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
67 A.2d 692, 4 N.J. Super. 451, 1949 N.J. Super. LEXIS 826, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shafto-v-indemnity-ins-co-of-north-america-njsuperctappdiv-1949.