Shafto v. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America
67 A.2d 692, 4 N.J. Super. 451, 1949 N.J. Super. LEXIS 826
Opinion
This appeal is from a judgment entered after a jury verdict. We are asked to reverse on the ground that the verdict is so clearly against the weight of evidence as to be without legal justification. To justify a reversal under Rule 1:2-20 it must be clear that the verdict is the result of misake, partiality or prejudice. We do not so find.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shafto v. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America, 67 A.2d 692, 4 N.J. Super. 451, 1949 N.J. Super. LEXIS 826 (N.J. Ct. App. 1949).
67 A.2d 692 (Shafto v. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.