Shaffer v. State
This text of 6 N.E. 818 (Shaffer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The only point made in this case is that the indictment does not show that the person to whom the intoxicating liquor was sold was under the age of twenty-one years. The averment of the indictment is: “ That one William Shaffer, late of said county, on the 1st day of November, 1884, at the county and State aforesaid, did then and there unlawfully sell to John Marshall, a person under the age of twenty-one years, one pint of intoxicating liquor, to wit, beer, at and for the price of fifteen cents.” In our opinion, this averment clearly shows that the person to whom the liquor was sold was at the time of the sale under the age of twenty-one years. The construction we have placed upon the indictment is such as it would receive in jurisdictions [320]*320where the common law prevails. State v. Price, 6 Halst. (N. J.) 203; Com. v. Bugbee, 4 Gray, 206.
There can be no doubt that such an indictment as the one before us is sufficient under our liberal statute. R. S. 1881, sections 1755, 1756.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 N.E. 818, 106 Ind. 319, 1886 Ind. LEXIS 117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shaffer-v-state-ind-1886.