Shaffer v. Kusnetz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Shaffer v. Kusnetz

256 A.D. 826, 9 N.Y.S.2d 788, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5035

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 13, 1939·Published

Opinion

In an action against the defendants for conspiring to induce the breach of a contract of real estate brokers so as to deprive them of their commissions earned by the sale of property, defendant Hollander moved to dismiss the second and third causes of action in the complaint. The motion Was granted as'to the third cause of action and denied as to the second cause of action. Order, in so far as an appeal is taken therefrom, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Appellant has Leave to serve an answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action against the defendants for conspiring to induce the breach of a contract of real estate brokers so as to deprive them of their commissions earned by the sale of property, defendant Hollander moved to dismiss the second and third causes of action in the complaint. The motion Was granted as'to the third cause of action and denied as to the second cause of action. Order, in so far as an appeal is taken therefrom, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Appellant has Leave to serve an answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Shaffer v. Kusnetz, 256 A.D. 826, 9 N.Y.S.2d 788, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5035 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

256 A.D. 826 (Shaffer v. Kusnetz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.