Shaffer v. Hirsch

New York Court of Appeals

Shaffer v. Hirsch

41 N.Y. 960

DecidedMarch 31, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 41 N.Y. 960 (Shaffer v. Hirsch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shaffer v. Hirsch, 41 N.Y. 960 (N.Y. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs, on the memorandum at the Appellate Division, with the added observation that the record reveals that the failure to complete the examination before trial of the defendant Hirsch appears to be attributable in the [962]*962main to the harassing, abusive and vulgar tactics employed by counsel for plaintiff.

Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with costs, on the memorandum at the Appellate Division, with the added observation that the record reveals that the failure to complete the examination before trial of the defendant Hirsch appears to be attributable in the [962]*962main to the harassing, abusive and vulgar tactics employed by counsel for plaintiff.

Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 N.Y. 960, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shaffer-v-hirsch-ny-1977.