Shaffer v. Fate

68 Ohio St. (N.S.) 647
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 17, 1903·No. No. 7674·Published

Opinion

[648]*648Judgment affirmed on the ground that the contract was not part of petition, and not printed in bill of exceptions,. and is therefore not before this court for consideration.

Burket, C. J., Davis and Price, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shaffer v. Fate, 68 Ohio St. (N.S.) 647 (Ohio 1903).

68 Ohio St. (N.S.) 647 (Shaffer v. Fate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.