Shafer v. Second Nat. Bank
This text of 4 N.M. 141 (Shafer v. Second Nat. Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Mexico Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff commenced an action of debt in the court below upon an express contract for interest upon deposits made with defendant, amounting to the sum of $917.48. Defendant pleaded the general issue. There was a trial by jury and verdict and judgment for plaintiff for the full amount of his claim. Prom this judgment defendant appealed, but has failed to perfect its appeal by filing in this court a, transcript of the record and proceedings in the cause. Plaintiff now produces a transcript of the record, and moves to affirm the judgment, and for 10 per cent, damages, as provided by sections 2189 and 2191, Comp. Laws.1 An examination of the record now before us fails to disclose any defense to the action. We are therefore bound to presume that the judgment was fully justified by the evidence, and that the appeal is without merit, but was taken solely for delay. The statute is intended to discourage vexatious and groundless appeals. We therefore affirm the judgment, with 6 per cent, damages.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 N.M. 141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shafer-v-second-nat-bank-nm-1887.