Shafer v. Maryland

267 F. App'x 302
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 29, 2008·No. No. 07-7384·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Phillip Mark Shafer appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for a writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Shafer’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Shafer v. Maryland, No. 8:07-cv-02088-PJM (D. Md. filed Aug. 23, 2007 & entered Aug. 24, 2007). We also deny Shafer’s request for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shafer v. Maryland, 267 F. App'x 302 (4th Cir. 2008).

267 F. App'x 302 (Shafer v. Maryland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reid v. Warden Gomez
N.D. West Virginia, 2019
Minton v. Young
S.D. West Virginia, 2019
Allen v. Young
S.D. West Virginia, 2019