Shafer v. Hartman

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6553

P. MARK SHAFER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ROBERT HARTMAN, Acting Supervisor C & O Canal NPS; LISA MENDELSON-IELMINI, Deputy Regional Director - NPS Capital Region; JOHN DOE, Acting Deputy Regional Director NPS; U.S. GOVERNMENT, Washington, DC,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (8:08- cv-00577-PJM)

Submitted: September 16, 2008 Decided: September 19, 2008

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

P. Mark Shafer, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

P. Mark Shafer appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1985, 1986

(2000), and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of

Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. Shafer v. Hartman, No. 8:08-cv-

00577-PJM (D. Md. Mar. 31, 2008). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED