Shafer v. Ellis
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7689
PHILLIP MARK SHAFER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CHRISTINE ELLIS, Individually & Officially; DANA MAYLON, Ethics Commissioner,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:08-cv-00482-PJM)
Submitted: May 21, 2010 Decided: June 4, 2010
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Phillip Mark Shafer, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Phillip Mark Shafer appeals the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Shafer v. Ellis, No. 8:08-cv-00482-PJM (D. Md.
Feb. 29, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shafer v. Ellis (Shafer v. Ellis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.