Shafer v. Ellis

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 4, 2010·No. 08-7689A·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7689

PHILLIP MARK SHAFER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CHRISTINE ELLIS, Individually & Officially; DANA MAYLON, Ethics Commissioner,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:08-cv-00482-PJM)

Submitted: May 21, 2010 Decided: June 4, 2010

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Phillip Mark Shafer, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Phillip Mark Shafer appeals the district court’s order

dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006)

complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Shafer v. Ellis, No. 8:08-cv-00482-PJM (D. Md.

Feb. 29, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shafer v. Ellis, (4th Cir. 2010).

Shafer v. Ellis (Shafer v. Ellis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related