Shafer v. Direct Gen. Ins. Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Shafer v. Direct Gen. Ins. Co.

558 S.W.3d 134

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 2, 2018

DocketWD 81469

StatusPublished

This text of 558 S.W.3d 134 (Shafer v. Direct Gen. Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shafer v. Direct Gen. Ins. Co., 558 S.W.3d 134 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam

Thomas and Caroline Shafer (collectively, "Appellants") appeal the circuit court's entry of summary judgment in favor of Direct General Insurance Company ("Direct") on claims involving a vehicle insurance policy. Appellants contend the court erred in granting summary judgment because the insurance policy contains an ambiguity that should be construed against Direct to provide coverage for their claims. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam

Thomas and Caroline Shafer (collectively, "Appellants") appeal the circuit court's entry of summary judgment in favor of Direct General Insurance Company ("Direct") on claims involving a vehicle insurance policy. Appellants contend the court erred in granting summary judgment because the insurance policy contains an ambiguity that should be construed against Direct to provide coverage for their claims. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

558 S.W.3d 134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shafer-v-direct-gen-ins-co-moctapp-2018.