Shaeffer v. Smyth

Texas Commission of Appeals

Shaeffer v. Smyth

79 S.W.2d 847

CourtTexas Commission of Appeals

DecidedMarch 20, 1935

DocketMotion Nos. 11804, 11807; No. 1824-6306

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 79 S.W.2d 847 (Shaeffer v. Smyth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Commission of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shaeffer v. Smyth, 79 S.W.2d 847 (Tex. Super. Ct. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

GERMAN, Commissioner;

In motion for rehearing, our attention is called to the fact that in stating the relief sought by the insurance company we stated as follows: “In the alternative, it proposed to reconvey the property,” etc. We should have said, “retain the property,” and" the opinion is corrected in that respect.

[848]*848We also change the language of the decree so that the same shall read as follows:

“The judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals and of the trial court are hereby reversed, and judgment is here rendered in favor of plaintiff in error, Pan-American Life Insurance Company, against defendant in error, Ward-I-Iarrison Mortgage Company, tor the amount of the Wisely indebtedness, with interest to date of final settlement, subject to a credit of $2,500.00 as óf date August 4, 1925, and for all costs of suit; and plaintiff in error will duly re-assign to defendant in error without recourse the unpaid balance of the Wisely indebtedness, without the deed of trust security for the payment of same; and the cause is remanded in order that the trial court may enter judgment in accordance herewith.”

The judgment in all other particulars remains unchanged, and all motions for rehearing are overruled.

Opinion adopted by the Supreme Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GERMAN, Commissioner;

In motion for rehearing, our attention is called to the fact that in stating the relief sought by the insurance company we stated as follows: “In the alternative, it proposed to reconvey the property,” etc. We should have said, “retain the property,” and" the opinion is corrected in that respect.

[848]*848We also change the language of the decree so that the same shall read as follows:

“The judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals and of the trial court are hereby reversed, and judgment is here rendered in favor of plaintiff in error, Pan-American Life Insurance Company, against defendant in error, Ward-I-Iarrison Mortgage Company, tor the amount of the Wisely indebtedness, with interest to date of final settlement, subject to a credit of $2,500.00 as óf date August 4, 1925, and for all costs of suit; and plaintiff in error will duly re-assign to defendant in error without recourse the unpaid balance of the Wisely indebtedness, without the deed of trust security for the payment of same; and the cause is remanded in order that the trial court may enter judgment in accordance herewith.”

The judgment in all other particulars remains unchanged, and all motions for rehearing are overruled.

Opinion adopted by the Supreme Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

79 S.W.2d 847, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shaeffer-v-smyth-texcommnapp-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack