Shae Kevin Graham v. Sharea Foster
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
February 5, 2016 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
Stephen J. Markman
Brian K. Zahra
152058 Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano
Richard H. Bernstein
Joan L. Larsen,
SHAE KEVIN GRAHAM, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,
v SC: 152058 COA: 318487 Oakland CC: 2013-808521-DP SHAREA FOSTER, Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 16, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.305(H)(1). The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order addressing whether the Court of Appeals correctly held that a necessary-party defendant may be brought into a lawsuit after the expiration of the limitations period based on the relation-back doctrine. See Casserly v Wayne Circuit Judge, 124 Mich 157, 161 (1900), Prather Engineering Co v Detroit, F & S Ry Co, 152 Mich 582, 585 (1908); but see Miller v Chapman Contracting, 477 Mich 102, 105 (2007) (“the relation-back doctrine does not extend to the addition of new parties”). The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
February 5, 2016
s0202
Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shae Kevin Graham v. Sharea Foster (Shae Kevin Graham v. Sharea Foster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.