Shady Oaks Mobile v. Fla. Psc

654 So. 2d 678
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 22, 1995·No. 93-3339·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

654 So.2d 678 (1995)

SHADY OAKS MOBILE MODULAR ESTATES, INC., Appellant,
v.
FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, Appellee.

No. 93-3339.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 22, 1995.

Robert A. Antista and John L. Wharton of Rose, Sundstrom & Bentley, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert D. Vandiver, General Counsel, and David E. Smith, Director of Appeals, Florida Public Service Com'n, Tallahassee, for appellee.

ZEHMER, Chief Judge.

The final order of the Public Service Commission imposing a fine against the appellant utility company is affirmed. See Florida Real Estate Commission v. Webb, 367 So.2d 201 (Fla. 1978). Although Appellant argues that the final order fails to find specifically that Appellant knowingly refused to comply with, or willfully violated, a provision of chapter 367 or any lawful rule or order of the commission, that issue was never raised in the proceedings before the commission or in Appellant's motion for reconsideration of the final order and therefore cannot be raised for the first time on appeal.

AFFIRMED.

DAVIS, J., and WENTWORTH, Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shady Oaks Mobile v. Fla. Psc, 654 So. 2d 678 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

654 So. 2d 678 (Shady Oaks Mobile v. Fla. Psc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rosenzweig v. Department of Transp.
979 So. 2d 1050 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Goodson v. DEPT. OF BUSINESS AND PROF. REG.
978 So. 2d 195 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Stueber v. Gallagher
812 So. 2d 454 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)