Shadrick v. State
This text of 1919 OK CR 263 (Shadrick v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff in error, Bert Shadrick, and Charles H. Holden were jointly charged, tried, and convicted on an information charging the' unlawful transporting of 60 half pints of whisky in an Overland automobile from one point to another certain point in Oklahoma City. The jury fixed the punishment of each at confinement for three months in the county jail and a fine of $25C- From the judgments rendered in pursuance of the verdict an appeal was perfected by filing in this court on February 20, 1918, petition in error, with case-made.
The appeal of the defendant Holden was dismissed on account of tus leaving the state without leave of the court. 14 Okla. Cr. 463, 172 Pac. 977. An examination of the record discloses that the testimony on the part of the Gate to prove the allegations of the information is undisputed, and that the errors assigned are destitute of merit.
The judgment against the plaintiff in error, Bert Shadrick, is therefore affirmed. Mandate forthwith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1919 OK CR 263, 183 P. 520, 16 Okla. Crim. 706, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shadrick-v-state-oklacrimapp-1919.