Shade v. Vilsack
This text of Shade v. Vilsack (Shade v. Vilsack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT " FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA F § L E §
ALBERT SHADE, : JUN 2 6 2017 ; CC|erk, U.S. Dlst_rlct & Bankruptcy Plaintiff’ : ourts for the Drstrlct of Columb|a v. ' ; civil Action No. 17-1140 (UNA) lTOM VILSACK, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION
The Court construes the complaint as plaintiff s latest attempt to sue the United States Department of Agriculture for its discriminatory\lending practices in 1982. The court previously held that there is no legal basis to do so outside of the Consent Decree reached in Pigford v. Glz`ckman, Civ. No. 97-1978 (D.D.C. 1999). See Shaa'e v. U.S. Cong., 942 F. Supp. 2d 43, 49 (D.D.C. 2013), a ’d sub nom. Shaa'e v. Cong., No. 13-5185, ;9.013 WL 5975978 (D.C. Cir. Oct.
15;2013)
The Court Will grant plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the
complaint An Order consistent With this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately.
_/\/~ DATE; jaw/cc £3,52@'? /M %_,__
United S)%s District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Shade v. Vilsack, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shade-v-vilsack-dcd-2017.