Shaddon v. Express Personnel Services

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Shaddon v. Express Personnel Services

2009 OK 45, 213 P.3d 1157, 2009 Okla. LEXIS 46, 2009 WL 1763246

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedJune 22, 2009

Docket106445

StatusPublished

This text of 2009 OK 45 (Shaddon v. Express Personnel Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shaddon v. Express Personnel Services, 2009 OK 45, 213 P.3d 1157, 2009 Okla. LEXIS 46, 2009 WL 1763246 (Okla. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER OF SUMMARY DISPOSITION

{1 In this matter, THE COURT FINDS, from a review of the record and briefs submitted, that this Court's recent decision in Summers v. American Insurance Co., 2009 OK 33, 213 P.3d 565 (rehearing denied June 22, 2009), is dispositive of the issues presented. Rule 1.201 of the Oklahoma Supreme Court Rules provides that "[iln any ease in which it appears that a prior controlling appellate decision is dispositive of the appeal, the court may summarily affirm or reverse, citing in its order of summary disposition this rule and the controlling decision." Okla. Stat. tit, 12, ch. 15. app. 1 (2001).

T2 The record in this matter does not contain an order from the Workers' Compensation Court which demonstrates compliance with section 42(A) of the Workers' Compensation Act or Rule 58 of the Rules of the Workers' Compensation Court. Further, the record contains no order "which certifies that previously awarded medical [or wage] benefits have not been provided as ordered, and demonstrates no good cause for Insurer's failure to do so." Summers, 2009 OK 33, ¶ 17, 213 P.3d 565.

13 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the decision of the District Court is affirmed.

/s/ James E. Edmondson JAMES E. EDMONDSON, Chief Justice

CONCUR: EDMONDSON, C.J., TAYLOR, V.C.J., OPALA, KAUGER, WATT, WINCHESTER, COLBERT, REIF, JJ. DISSENTS: HARGRAVE, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER OF SUMMARY DISPOSITION

{1 In this matter, THE COURT FINDS, from a review of the record and briefs submitted, that this Court's recent decision in Summers v. American Insurance Co., 2009 OK 33, 213 P.3d 565 (rehearing denied June 22, 2009), is dispositive of the issues presented. Rule 1.201 of the Oklahoma Supreme Court Rules provides that "[iln any ease in which it appears that a prior controlling appellate decision is dispositive of the appeal, the court may summarily affirm or reverse, citing in its order of summary disposition this rule and the controlling decision." Okla. Stat. tit, 12, ch. 15. app. 1 (2001).

T2 The record in this matter does not contain an order from the Workers' Compensation Court which demonstrates compliance with section 42(A) of the Workers' Compensation Act or Rule 58 of the Rules of the Workers' Compensation Court. Further, the record contains no order "which certifies that previously awarded medical [or wage] benefits have not been provided as ordered, and demonstrates no good cause for Insurer's failure to do so." Summers, 2009 OK 33, ¶ 17, 213 P.3d 565.

13 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the decision of the District Court is affirmed.

/s/ James E. Edmondson JAMES E. EDMONDSON, Chief Justice

CONCUR: EDMONDSON, C.J., TAYLOR, V.C.J., OPALA, KAUGER, WATT, WINCHESTER, COLBERT, REIF, JJ. DISSENTS: HARGRAVE, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2009 OK 45, 213 P.3d 1157, 2009 Okla. LEXIS 46, 2009 WL 1763246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shaddon-v-express-personnel-services-okla-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack