Shaddix v. Kendrick

419 S.W.2d 908, 1967 Tex. App. LEXIS 2685
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 27, 1967
DocketNo. 5912
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 419 S.W.2d 908 (Shaddix v. Kendrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shaddix v. Kendrick, 419 S.W.2d 908, 1967 Tex. App. LEXIS 2685 (Tex. Ct. App. 1967).

Opinion

OPINION

CLAYTON, Justice.

This is a suit attacking the formation and operation of an underground water conservation district. The suit was brought by C. R. Shaddix and three others, individually and as resident property owners and taxpayers of Gaines County, Texas, for themselves and as representatives of all property owners and tax-payers of the areas of seven Texas counties included in the South Plains Underground Water Conservation District No. 4, against John Kendrick, President, and five others, Directors of the District.

The history leading up to this litigation is, as briefly as possible, as follows: In the latter part of 1965 a petition signed by some fifty tax-paying landowners within the territory herein involved was presented to the Texas Water Rights Commission, pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3A of Title 128, Vernon’s Ann.Tex.Rev.Civ.St, asking for a hearing on the creation and organization of an underground water district under Texas Constitution, Article XVI, section 59, Vernon’s Ann.St., and Article 7880-3c, T.R.C.S., to be known as South Plains Underground Water Conservation District No. 4. This petition described the territory to be included by metes and bounds, and stated that it was located wholly within Subdivision No. 4 of the Underground Water Reservoir, High Plains Area South of the Canadian River, as designated by order of the Texas Water Commission dated April 13, 1965. Pursuant to this petition, notice was issued and a hearing was held and order entered by the Commission on February 2, 1966 granting the petition and reciting that the boundaries of the proposed district are “co-terminus with the ‘subdivision 4 of the Underground Reservoir, High Plains Areas, South of the Canadian River.’ ” The [910]*910order recited further that notice was given as required by law by publication in the Lubbock Avalanche-Journal, “a newspaper of general circulation in the area of the proposed district”, and stating that “said district shall be composed of the area described in the order of the Commission, dated April 13, 1965 * * * and includes portions of the counties of Andrews, Cochran, Dawson, Gaines, Lynn, Terry and Yoakum * * * ” and describing the said district by metes and bounds. The order also appointed Kendrick and four others as temporary directors of the district. This order was filed in the county clerk’s office in each affected county in the district.

The temporary directors then met and issued notice of an election to be held' on April 26, 1966, the voters to vote “for” or “against” confirmation of the district and “for” or “against” a maintenance ad valor-um tax, and the election of a director in each precinct of the district. This notice was published in the Lubbock Avalanche-Journal, described by the Commission as a newspaper of general circulation in this area. Voting precincts were so arranged that the votes in each municipality in a county could be counted separately from the votes in the balance, or rural, areas of the county, and those in each county counted separately from each other county.

The election was then held, with results as to the votes on confirmation of the district and the imposition of a maintenance tax being as follows:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shaddix v. Kendrick
430 S.W.2d 461 (Texas Supreme Court, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
419 S.W.2d 908, 1967 Tex. App. LEXIS 2685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shaddix-v-kendrick-texapp-1967.