Shacknow v. Shacknow

248 A.D. 827, 289 N.Y.S. 95, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7513
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 2, 1936
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 248 A.D. 827 (Shacknow v. Shacknow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shacknow v. Shacknow, 248 A.D. 827, 289 N.Y.S. 95, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7513 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

In an action for divorce, order adjudging defendant guilty of contempt in failing to pay alimony under the provisions of the final judgment, as modified, reversed upon the law, without costs, and the motion denied. It appears that these parties settled and adjusted their differences relating to the wife’s support by an agreement providing for the payment of a certain sum. That agreement has never been rescinded, and there is no claim that it was improvidently made or procured by fraud. While it remains in force the plaintiff may not treat it as a nullity and resort to contempt proceedings under the final judgment. Lazansky, P. J., Young and Davis, JJ., concur; Hagarty, J., dissents and votes to affirm; Carswell, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kolmer v. Kolmer
13 Misc. 2d 313 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
248 A.D. 827, 289 N.Y.S. 95, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7513, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shacknow-v-shacknow-nyappdiv-1936.