Shackman v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Shackman v. United States

41 Cust. Ct. 328

United States Customs Court·Decided July 22, 1958·No. No. 62192; protests 278633-K, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of paperweights in chief value of polystyrene similar in all material respects to those the subject of B. Shackman & Company et al. v. United States (38 Cust. Ct. 30, C. D. 1839), the claim at 20 percent under paragraph 1558 as nonenumerated manufactured articles was sustained. The items marked “B,” stipulated to be the same as the merchandise involved in C. D. 1839, supra, were held dutiable at 10 percent under said paragraph 1558, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52739), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52827).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of paperweights in chief value of polystyrene similar in all material respects to those the subject of B. Shackman & Company et al. v. United States (38 Cust. Ct. 30, C. D. 1839), the claim at 20 percent under paragraph 1558 as nonenumerated manufactured articles was sustained. The items marked “B,” stipulated to be the same as the merchandise involved in C. D. 1839, supra, were held dutiable at 10 percent under said paragraph 1558, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52739), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52827).

Shackman v. United States, 41 Cust. Ct. 328 (cusc 1958).

Pincite

41 Cust. Ct. 328 (Shackman v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related