Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Shackman v. Cala

Shackman v. Cala

268 A.D. 1079, 53 N.Y.S.2d 15, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5582
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 16, 1945
StatusPublished

This text of 268 A.D. 1079 (Shackman v. Cala) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shackman v. Cala, 268 A.D. 1079, 53 N.Y.S.2d 15, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5582 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).

Opinion

Judgment afOrmed, with costs. Memorandum: The counterclaim pleads, and the evidence justified the finding of, an intentional tort. (Warschauser v. Brooklyn Furniture Co., 159 App. Div. 81; Scott v. Prudential Outfitting Co., Inc., 92 Misc. 195; Doucette v. Sailinger, 228 Mass. 444.) Punitive damages therefore were properly awarded. From the record we conclude that the verdict was not excessive. All concur. (The judgment affirms a judgment of Buffalo City Court in favor of defendant in an action to recover the purchase price of merchandise.) Present— Taylor, P. J., Dowling, McCurn, Larkin and Love, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scott ex rel. Scott v. Prudential Outfitting Co.
92 Misc. 195 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915)
Doucette v. Sallinger
117 N.E. 897 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1917)
Warschauser v. Brooklyn Furniture Co.
144 N.Y.S. 257 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
268 A.D. 1079, 53 N.Y.S.2d 15, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5582, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shackman-v-cala-nyappdiv-1945.