Shackley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Shackley v. State

782 S.W.2d 146, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 1872, 1989 WL 156009

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 29, 1989

DocketNo. 56306

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 782 S.W.2d 146 (Shackley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shackley v. State, 782 S.W.2d 146, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 1872, 1989 WL 156009 (Mo. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

, Movant appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the [147]*147reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

, Movant appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the [147]*147reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

782 S.W.2d 146, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 1872, 1989 WL 156009, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shackley-v-state-moctapp-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack