Shackley v. State
782 S.W.2d 146, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 1872, 1989 WL 156009
Opinion
ORDER
, Movant appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the [147]*147reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shackley v. State, 782 S.W.2d 146, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 1872, 1989 WL 156009 (Mo. Ct. App. 1989).
782 S.W.2d 146 (Shackley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Daniel Castro Gallardo, Jr. v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2018