Shackleford v. Post Publishing Co.
This text of 61 Cal. 494 (Shackleford v. Post Publishing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The Court below found the employment of plaintiff by defendant as its Secretary, the rendition of services under such employment, and the value of such services. The Court also found that the plaintiff had not undertaken or agreed that the services should be rendered by him gratuitously. Judgment went for plaintiff.
It seems to us that there is a substantial conflict in the evidence as to whether the services were to be rendered gratuitously; and, in view of the rule established here, we will not interfere with the findings.
Judgment and order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
61 Cal. 494, 1882 Cal. LEXIS 650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shackleford-v-post-publishing-co-cal-1882.