Shackleford v. Lundquist
367 N.C. 523
This text of 367 N.C. 523 (Shackleford v. Lundquist) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Shackleford v. Lundquist, 367 N.C. 523 (N.C. 2014).
Opinion
1. Def’s NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA13-960)
2. Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31
3. Def’s Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Authority in Support of NOA and PDR
1. Dismissed Ex Mero Mota
2. Denied
3. Denied
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
§ 7A-31
North Carolina § 7A-31
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
367 N.C. 523, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shackleford-v-lundquist-nc-2014.