Shackford v. Bouchard

550 A.2d 68, 1988 Me. LEXIS 292
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedNovember 22, 1988
StatusPublished

This text of 550 A.2d 68 (Shackford v. Bouchard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shackford v. Bouchard, 550 A.2d 68, 1988 Me. LEXIS 292 (Me. 1988).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Contrary to the contention of Robert Shackford on his appeal from a summary judgment of the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Brodrick, J.) in favor of Lawrence Bouchard, the trial court properly held that the 90-day tolling period of 24 M.R.S.A. § 2903 (repealed and replaced by P.L. 1985, ch. 804, § 14) was not operative because Shackford’s written notice was not served on Bouchard, and the statute of limitations for alleged negligent professional health care, see 14 M.R.S.A. § 753 (1980) (current version at 24 M.R.S.A. § 2902 (Supp.1988)), therefore barred Shackford’s claim. Paradis v. Webber Hospital, 409 A.2d 672 (Me.1979).

The entry is:

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Paradis v. Webber Hospital
409 A.2d 672 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
550 A.2d 68, 1988 Me. LEXIS 292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shackford-v-bouchard-me-1988.