Shacker v. State
This text of 106 So. 3d 36 (Shacker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Bryan Shacker appeals the trial court’s order revoking his probation and the resulting sentence. We affirm the revocation and sentence; we remand to have the written order of revocation amended to reflect the trial judge’s oral rulings.
In 2003, after a guilty plea, Shacker was adjudicated guilty of three counts of attempted sexual battery on a minor and three counts of lewd and lascivious assault on a child. He was sentenced to five years in prison followed by ten years’ probation. Seven years later, the State filed an amended affidavit alleging Shacker committed nine violations of his probation, relating to his failure to maintain contact with his probation officer.
Following an evidentiary hearing, the trial court announced from the bench that Shacker committed five of the nine alleged violations: violations two, three, four, six, and nine. The trial court also concluded that the State failed to prove that Shacker committed the remaining four alleged violations. The written order of revocation of probation, however, reflected that Shacker committed all nine alleged violations. As the State concedes, the written order should correctly reflect the oral pronouncement. See Smith v. State, 100 So.3d 258, 254 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012); see also Stark v. State, 712 So.2d 454, 455 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); Reiter v. State, 674 So.2d 189, 190-91 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded to the Court below to strike those portions of the order finding that Shacker had committed violations 1, 5, 7 and 8.1
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
106 So. 3d 36, 2013 WL 332134, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 1212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shacker-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.