Shackelford v. Supreme Conclave Knights of Damon

Supreme Court of Georgia

Shackelford v. Supreme Conclave Knights of Damon

30 S.E. 639, 105 Ga. 470, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 556

DecidedMarch 25, 1898

StatusPublished

This text of 30 S.E. 639 (Shackelford v. Supreme Conclave Knights of Damon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shackelford v. Supreme Conclave Knights of Damon, 30 S.E. 639, 105 Ga. 470, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 556 (Ga. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

The charge of the court was in accord with the law as laid down by this court when this case was here before, 98 Ga. 295; the requests to charge, so far as pertinent and legal, were covered by the charge as given; there was no error in excluding evidence; the verdict was authorized by the evidence and the trial judge did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Simmons, C. J.

The charge of the court was in accord with the law as laid down by this court when this case was here before, 98 Ga. 295; the requests to charge, so far as pertinent and legal, were covered by the charge as given; there was no error in excluding evidence; the verdict was authorized by the evidence and the trial judge did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 S.E. 639, 105 Ga. 470, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shackelford-v-supreme-conclave-knights-of-damon-ga-1898.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack