Shackelford v. Killark Electric Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Shackelford v. Killark Electric Co.

886 S.W.2d 757, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1801

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 22, 1994·No. No. 66127·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Employee appeals the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) denying employee disability compensation. We affirm. The order of the Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the record as a whole and no error of law appears; an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Employee appeals the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) denying employee disability compensation. We affirm. The order of the Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the record as a whole and no error of law appears; an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Shackelford v. Killark Electric Co., 886 S.W.2d 757, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1801 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

886 S.W.2d 757 (Shackelford v. Killark Electric Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.