Shachnow v. Shafer

959 N.E.2d 514, 17 N.Y.3d 935, 2011 NY Slip Op 90196, 935 N.Y.S.2d 577, 2011 N.Y. LEXIS 3272
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 21, 2011·Published

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order of affirmance and dismissal, dismissed as untimely (see CPLR 5513 [b]; Eaton v State of New York, 76 NY2d 824 [1990]); motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order denying reargument, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shachnow v. Shafer, 959 N.E.2d 514, 17 N.Y.3d 935, 2011 NY Slip Op 90196, 935 N.Y.S.2d 577, 2011 N.Y. LEXIS 3272 (N.Y. 2011).

959 N.E.2d 514 (Shachnow v. Shafer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Eaton v. State
559 N.E.2d 675 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)