Shabazz v. State

685 So. 2d 65, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13243, 1996 WL 727140
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Shabazz v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 674 So. 2d 920
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 19, 1996·No. No. 95-2880·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon the State’s concession that appellant should have received credit for the time he previously served on probation against his new 3 year probationary term, we remand this case to the trial court to correct such oversight. We affirm as to all other issues raised by appellant.

Remanded with directions.

MINER, ALLEN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shabazz v. State, 685 So. 2d 65, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13243, 1996 WL 727140 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

685 So. 2d 65 (Shabazz v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.