Shabazz v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Shabazz v. State

422 So. 2d 1062, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21845

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 1, 1982

DocketNo. 82-890

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 422 So. 2d 1062 (Shabazz v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shabazz v. State, 422 So. 2d 1062, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21845 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Abdul Wali Shabazz appeals from an order of the trial court denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus. We treat this petition for writ of habeas corpus as a motion for post-conviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

Appellant’s allegation concerning the propriety of certain jury instructions attempts to raise matters which properly should have been raised on direct appeal. Merrill v. State, 364 So.2d 42 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). Appellant may not present such matters in a motion seeking post-conviction relief. Stallings v. State, 319 So.2d 640 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975).

AFFIRMED.

BOARDMAN, A.C.J., and SCHEB and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI