Shabazz v. Hill

Fourth Circuit

Shabazz v. Hill

211 F. App'x 204

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 28, 2006·No. No. 06-1923·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Be’Kura Shabazz appeals the district court’s order dismissing plaintiffs complaint for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Shabazz v. Hill, No. 3:06-cv-00211-RLW (E.D.Va. July 12, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Be’Kura Shabazz appeals the district court’s order dismissing plaintiffs complaint for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Shabazz v. Hill, No. 3:06-cv-00211-RLW (E.D.Va. July 12, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Shabazz v. Hill, 211 F. App'x 204 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

211 F. App'x 204 (Shabazz v. Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.