Shaari v. Harvard Student Agencies, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Shaari v. Harvard Student Agencies, Inc.

191 A.D.2d 280, 595 N.Y.S.2d 685, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2408

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 16, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 191 A.D.2d 280 (Shaari v. Harvard Student Agencies, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shaari v. Harvard Student Agencies, Inc., 191 A.D.2d 280, 595 N.Y.S.2d 685, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2408 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Irma V. Santaella, J.), entered June 23, 1992, which denied plaintiffs motion to vacate a prior judgment dismissing the action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

No basis exists to vacate the judgment pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (1) since plaintiff, in fact, did not default in opposing the prior motion that resulted in the judgment (cf., Meyerson v [281]*281John A. Lynch, Inc., 29 AD2d 761). Nor does the record demonstrate any mistake or omission warranting relief pursuant to CPLR 2001 (cf., People ex rel. Di Leo v Edwards, 247 App Div 331). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Kupferman and Asch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Irma V. Santaella, J.), entered June 23, 1992, which denied plaintiffs motion to vacate a prior judgment dismissing the action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

No basis exists to vacate the judgment pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (1) since plaintiff, in fact, did not default in opposing the prior motion that resulted in the judgment (cf., Meyerson v [281]*281John A. Lynch, Inc., 29 AD2d 761). Nor does the record demonstrate any mistake or omission warranting relief pursuant to CPLR 2001 (cf., People ex rel. Di Leo v Edwards, 247 App Div 331). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Kupferman and Asch, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

191 A.D.2d 280, 595 N.Y.S.2d 685, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2408, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shaari-v-harvard-student-agencies-inc-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack