Shaarbay v. Alvarez

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Shaarbay v. Alvarez

255 So. 3d 487

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 20, 2018

DocketNo. 3D17-1894

StatusPublished

This text of 255 So. 3d 487 (Shaarbay v. Alvarez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shaarbay v. Alvarez, 255 So. 3d 487 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

*488Affirmed. See § 61.14(6)(a)3., Fla. Stat. (2017) ("The judgment under this paragraph is a final judgment as to any unpaid payment or installment of support which has accrued up to the time either party files a motion with the court to alter or modify the support order, and such judgment may not be modified by the court."); Dep't of Revenue v. Jackson, 846 So.2d 486, 490 (Fla. 2003) ("Florida simply does not permit a retroactive reduction of accrued amounts due for support, even if such an approach were in the best interests of both the child in having some amount, albeit smaller, actually paid, and the obligor parent in making a manageable payment rather than being faced with the often unattainable and unrealistic expectation to satisfy large vested arrearages.").

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

*488Affirmed. See § 61.14(6)(a)3., Fla. Stat. (2017) ("The judgment under this paragraph is a final judgment as to any unpaid payment or installment of support which has accrued up to the time either party files a motion with the court to alter or modify the support order, and such judgment may not be modified by the court."); Dep't of Revenue v. Jackson, 846 So.2d 486, 490 (Fla. 2003) ("Florida simply does not permit a retroactive reduction of accrued amounts due for support, even if such an approach were in the best interests of both the child in having some amount, albeit smaller, actually paid, and the obligor parent in making a manageable payment rather than being faced with the often unattainable and unrealistic expectation to satisfy large vested arrearages.").

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

255 So. 3d 487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shaarbay-v-alvarez-fladistctapp-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack