S&H Transp., Inc. v. City of York

182 A.3d 994
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 21, 2018·No. 750 MAL 2017 (Granted)·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 21st day of March, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to the remaining issue. The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are:

1. Whether a freight broker is permitted to exclude freight delivery charges, to which the broker has no right to retain but rather utilizes solely for the purposes of purchasing transportation services for its customers, from its taxable gross receipts under the City of York's Business Privilege and Mercantile Tax Ordinance?
2. Whether a municipality may rely on more narrowly tailored exclusionary language contained in the Local Tax Enabling Act, 53 P.S. 5924.101 et seq., to interpret and enforce a more broadly worded exclusion contained in the municipalities ordinances?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

S&H Transp., Inc. v. City of York, 182 A.3d 994 (Pa. 2018).

182 A.3d 994 (S&H Transp., Inc. v. City of York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

S & H Transport, Aplt. v. City of York
210 A.3d 1028 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2019)