Sgarlata v. City of Schenectady

250 A.D. 789, 294 N.Y.S. 768
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 3, 1937·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

McNamee, Crapser and Heffeman, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J., dissents, with an opinion.

Rhodes, J.

I concur in the dissenting opinion of Presiding Justice Hill. The evidence does not establish that the inadequate culvert caused or contributed to the damage to plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sgarlata v. City of Schenectady, 250 A.D. 789, 294 N.Y.S. 768 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

250 A.D. 789 (Sgarlata v. City of Schenectady) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cooper v. Sharon Springs Central School District
8 A.D.3d 734 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)