Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/S.G. v. State

S.G. v. State

678 So. 2d 495, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8917, 1996 WL 476321
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 23, 1996
DocketNo. 96-215
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 678 So. 2d 495 (S.G. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
S.G. v. State, 678 So. 2d 495, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8917, 1996 WL 476321 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state has correctly conceded error in the lower court’s refusal to permit closing argument in the delinquency proceeding below based on Herring v. New York, 422 U.S. 853, 95 S.Ct. 2550, 45 L.Ed.2d 593 (1975). See also M.E.F. v. State, 595 S6.2d 86 (Fla. 2d DCA1992). We agree with appellant that the adjudications for both the charge of sale of a counterfeit controlled substance and the violations of community control must be reversed due to this error.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DAUKSCH, HARRIS and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

J.M.S. v. State
921 So. 2d 813 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
678 So. 2d 495, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8917, 1996 WL 476321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sg-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.