S.G. v. State
678 So. 2d 495, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8917, 1996 WL 476321
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 23, 1996·No. No. 96-215·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The state has correctly conceded error in the lower court’s refusal to permit closing argument in the delinquency proceeding below based on Herring v. New York, 422 U.S. 853, 95 S.Ct. 2550, 45 L.Ed.2d 593 (1975). See also M.E.F. v. State, 595 S6.2d 86 (Fla. 2d DCA1992). We agree with appellant that the adjudications for both the charge of sale of a counterfeit controlled substance and the violations of community control must be reversed due to this error.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
S.G. v. State, 678 So. 2d 495, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8917, 1996 WL 476321 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
678 So. 2d 495 (S.G. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
J.M.S. v. State
921 So. 2d 813 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)