S.G. v. Department of Children & Families

District Court of Appeal of Florida

S.G. v. Department of Children & Families

111 So. 3d 303, 2013 WL 1775513, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 6723

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 24, 2013

DocketNo. 5D12-3605

StatusPublished

This text of 111 So. 3d 303 (S.G. v. Department of Children & Families) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

S.G. v. Department of Children & Families, 111 So. 3d 303, 2013 WL 1775513, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 6723 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

S.G. (“Mother”) timely appeals the Orders rendered by the trial court placing her two children in separate permanent guardianships and terminating protective supervision. Mother raises several issues. In response, the Department of Children and Families and the Guardian ad Litem submitted respective Concessions of Error, conceding several errors that require reversal. Both the Department and the Guardian ad Litem request that this court remand this case for further proceedings to protect Mother’s due process rights and determine the best interests of the children given the current circumstances. Based on the Concessions of Error and our review of the record, we reverse the Orders under review and remand this case for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

SAWAYA, EVANDER and BERGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

S.G. (“Mother”) timely appeals the Orders rendered by the trial court placing her two children in separate permanent guardianships and terminating protective supervision. Mother raises several issues. In response, the Department of Children and Families and the Guardian ad Litem submitted respective Concessions of Error, conceding several errors that require reversal. Both the Department and the Guardian ad Litem request that this court remand this case for further proceedings to protect Mother’s due process rights and determine the best interests of the children given the current circumstances. Based on the Concessions of Error and our review of the record, we reverse the Orders under review and remand this case for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

SAWAYA, EVANDER and BERGER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

111 So. 3d 303, 2013 WL 1775513, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 6723, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sg-v-department-of-children-families-fladistctapp-2013.