SFR Holdings Ltd. v. Rice

New York Court of Appeals

SFR Holdings Ltd. v. Rice

50 N.E.3d 920, 27 N.Y.3d 977, 31 N.Y.S.3d 452, 2016 NY Slip Op 69237, 2016 N.Y. LEXIS 795

DecidedApril 5, 2016

StatusPublished

This text of 50 N.E.3d 920 (SFR Holdings Ltd. v. Rice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

SFR Holdings Ltd. v. Rice, 50 N.E.3d 920, 27 N.Y.3d 977, 31 N.Y.S.3d 452, 2016 NY Slip Op 69237, 2016 N.Y. LEXIS 795 (N.Y. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal as against respondents John Rice; Joseph Ingrassia; Capstone Capital Management, Inc.; Capstone Cayman Special Purpose Fund, LP; and Capstone Special Purpose Fund, LP, dismissed upon the ground that as to those respondents the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal as against respondents John Rice; Joseph Ingrassia; Capstone Capital Management, Inc.; Capstone Cayman Special Purpose Fund, LP; and Capstone Special Purpose Fund, LP, dismissed upon the ground that as to those respondents the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 N.E.3d 920, 27 N.Y.3d 977, 31 N.Y.S.3d 452, 2016 NY Slip Op 69237, 2016 N.Y. LEXIS 795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sfr-holdings-ltd-v-rice-ny-2016.