SFR Funding, Inc. v. Adria Operating Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

SFR Funding, Inc. v. Adria Operating Corp.

308 A.D.2d 484, 764 N.Y.S.2d 633

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 15, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 308 A.D.2d 484 (SFR Funding, Inc. v. Adria Operating Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

SFR Funding, Inc. v. Adria Operating Corp., 308 A.D.2d 484, 764 N.Y.S.2d 633 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for conversion, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Segal, J.), dated July 22, 2002, which granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In response to the plaintiff’s showing of its prima facie entitlement to summary judgment, the defendants failed to raise a triable issue of fact, or demonstrate that summary judgment should be denied without prejudice to renewal after the completion of discovery. Accordingly, summary judgment was properly granted in favor of the plaintiff (see generally Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320 [1986]).

In light of this determination, we need not reach the plaintiff’s contention concerning the appendix on the appeal. Altman, J.P., Florio, Adams and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for conversion, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Segal, J.), dated July 22, 2002, which granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In response to the plaintiff’s showing of its prima facie entitlement to summary judgment, the defendants failed to raise a triable issue of fact, or demonstrate that summary judgment should be denied without prejudice to renewal after the completion of discovery. Accordingly, summary judgment was properly granted in favor of the plaintiff (see generally Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320 [1986]).

In light of this determination, we need not reach the plaintiff’s contention concerning the appendix on the appeal. Altman, J.P., Florio, Adams and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

308 A.D.2d 484, 764 N.Y.S.2d 633, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sfr-funding-inc-v-adria-operating-corp-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack